Schaefer v. State

5 S.W.2d 982, 109 Tex. Crim. 609, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 383
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 1928·No. No. 11747.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary, punishment three years in the penitentiary. •

We find in the record no statement of facts, and but one bill of exceptions in the transcript. The complaint in this bill is of the overruling of the motion for new trial, apparently sought *610 on the ground of misconduct of the jury. The bill sets out the testimony of three jurors. We gather that appellant’s purpose was to show by said parties their misappropriation of certain testimony. The claim was that the testimony was admitted for one purpose and that the jury misappropriated same and used it for another purpose. We do not believe it permissible for a juror to attempt to impeach his verdict in this manner. Esquival v. State, 246 S. W. 399; Sims v. State, 258 S. W. 165.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaefer v. State, 5 S.W.2d 982, 109 Tex. Crim. 609, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 383 (Tex. 1928).

5 S.W.2d 982 (Schaefer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. State
273 S.W. 582 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Sims v. State
258 S.W. 165 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Esquivel v. State
246 S.W. 399 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Thomas v. State
274 S.W. 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)