Schaefer v. Schaefer

157 So. 331, 117 Fla. 103, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1200
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 27, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit for divorce in which the husband was complainant and was granted decree.

We find no reversible error disclosed by the record.

Heretofore appellant filed application for an order of this Court requiring appellee to .pay solicitor’s fees for the service of her solicitors in this Court, which matter was continued until final hearing of the cause.

It now appears to us that it is proper to require appellee to pay to appellant the sum of One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars for her solicitor’s fees in this Court.

The decree appealed from is affirmed and the appellee, Otto H. Schaefer is ordered to pay the appellant One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars as and for her solicitor’s fees in this Court within thirty days after the mandate herein shall have been filed in the Court below.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaefer v. Schaefer, 157 So. 331, 117 Fla. 103, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1200 (Fla. 1934).

157 So. 331 (Schaefer v. Schaefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodward v. Woodward
165 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)