Schaefer v. Schaefer

157 So. 331, 117 Fla. 103, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1200
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 So. 331 (Schaefer v. Schaefer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaefer v. Schaefer, 157 So. 331, 117 Fla. 103, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1200 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit for divorce in which the husband was complainant and was granted decree.

We find no reversible error disclosed by the record.

Heretofore appellant filed application for an order of this Court requiring appellee to .pay solicitor’s fees for the service of her solicitors in this Court, which matter was continued until final hearing of the cause.

It now appears to us that it is proper to require appellee to pay to appellant the sum of One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars for her solicitor’s fees in this Court.

The decree appealed from is affirmed and the appellee, Otto H. Schaefer is ordered to pay the appellant One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars as and for her solicitor’s fees in this Court within thirty days after the mandate herein shall have been filed in the Court below.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodward v. Woodward
165 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 331, 117 Fla. 103, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-v-schaefer-fla-1934.