Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 22, 2013·No. SCPW-13-0002165·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0002165 22-JUL-2013 10:59 AM

SCPW-13-0002165

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STEVEN R. SCHAEFER, Petitioner,

vs.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the June 22, 2013 letter from Steven R. Schaefer, it appears that Mr. Schaefer is seeking review of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s consideration of the complaint Mr. Schaefer filed against attorneys Hayden Aluli and Mimi Desjardins. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall file the June 22, 2013 letter as a petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 22, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, (haw 2013).

Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (Schaefer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.