Schaefer v. Maresca

241 A.D. 750

This text of 241 A.D. 750 (Schaefer v. Maresca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaefer v. Maresca, 241 A.D. 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Judgment in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and the facts and the exceptions'contained therein struck from the judgment, with costs. These exceptions enable the respondent to continue to interfere with the easements of ingress and egress accruing to appellants and should not have been excepted from the injunction to which plaintiffs were entitled. Conclusion of law numbered 1 is modified by striking out the words “ except that portion thereof which abuts defendant’s property; ” and the conclusion numbered 2 is reversed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-v-maresca-nyappdiv-1934.