Schaefer v. MacRi

196 F.2d 162, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 1952
Docket13129_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 196 F.2d 162 (Schaefer v. MacRi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaefer v. MacRi, 196 F.2d 162, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428 (9th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a second amended complaint for failure to state a cause entitling plaintiff to damages or other relief.

The dismissal was clearly warranted. Plaintiff’s attempt, apparently, was to state a cause against the appellees in civil conspiracy. His pleading is couched mainly in verbose generalities, irrelevancies and conclusions, no facts being set out showing that there was a concert of action among the defendants, none from which a proper inference of collusion may be drawn and none stated which shows that any damage to the plaintiff resulted as a natural or probable consequence of the acts alleged.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morton v. Rank America, Inc.
812 F. Supp. 1062 (C.D. California, 1993)
Harper v. United States
423 F. Supp. 192 (D. South Carolina, 1976)
Stichman v. Fischman
154 F. Supp. 867 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.
114 F. Supp. 643 (D. Hawaii, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 F.2d 162, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-v-macri-ca9-1952.