Schaefer v. MacRi

196 F.2d 162, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1952·No. 13129_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a second amended complaint for failure to state a cause entitling plaintiff to damages or other relief.

The dismissal was clearly warranted. Plaintiff’s attempt, apparently, was to state a cause against the appellees in civil conspiracy. His pleading is couched mainly in verbose generalities, irrelevancies and conclusions, no facts being set out showing that there was a concert of action among the defendants, none from which a proper inference of collusion may be drawn and none stated which shows that any damage to the plaintiff resulted as a natural or probable consequence of the acts alleged.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaefer v. MacRi, 196 F.2d 162, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428 (9th Cir. 1952).

196 F.2d 162 (Schaefer v. MacRi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morton v. Rank America, Inc.
812 F. Supp. 1062 (C.D. California, 1993)
Harper v. United States
423 F. Supp. 192 (D. South Carolina, 1976)
Stichman v. Fischman
154 F. Supp. 867 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.
114 F. Supp. 643 (D. Hawaii, 1953)