Schaefer v. Lamone

248 F. App'x 484
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2007·No. No. 07-1003·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Schaefer appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint alleging Maryland’s Election Law requiring alphabetical listing of candidates’ names on ballots violated the Equal Protection Clause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Schaefer v. Lamone, No. l:06-cv00896-BEL (D.Md. Dec. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaefer v. Lamone, 248 F. App'x 484 (4th Cir. 2007).

248 F. App'x 484 (Schaefer v. Lamone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DCCC and DSCC v. Dunlap
Maine Superior, 2020
Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Alcorn
826 F.3d 708 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Sarvis v. Judd
80 F. Supp. 3d 692 (E.D. Virginia, 2015)
Green Party v. Hargett
953 F. Supp. 2d 816 (M.D. Tennessee, 2013)