Schaefer v. Groton Corp.
253 A.D. 807, 2 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8669
Opinion
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion, on the ground that the letter of September 16, 1936, evidenced a hiring at will only and contained no ambiguity.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schaefer v. Groton Corp., 253 A.D. 807, 2 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
253 A.D. 807 (Schaefer v. Groton Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.