Schaefer v. Goldstein
468 N.E.2d 704, 63 N.Y.2d 653, 479 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4516
This text of 468 N.E.2d 704 (Schaefer v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schaefer v. Goldstein, 468 N.E.2d 704, 63 N.Y.2d 653, 479 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4516 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The findings of the Appellate Division more nearly comport with the weight of the evidence than do those of the Surrogate’s Court.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
468 N.E.2d 704, 63 N.Y.2d 653, 479 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-v-goldstein-ny-1984.