Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schaefer Pontiac-Saab of Racine, Inc. v. Danburg

Schaefer Pontiac-Saab of Racine, Inc. v. Danburg

576 So. 2d 381, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 1991 WL 32134
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3394
StatusPublished

This text of 576 So. 2d 381 (Schaefer Pontiac-Saab of Racine, Inc. v. Danburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaefer Pontiac-Saab of Racine, Inc. v. Danburg, 576 So. 2d 381, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 1991 WL 32134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat the petition for writ of certiora-ri as an application for mandamus and grant the petition. The trial court is directed to proceed with a determination of the petitioners’ application for attorney’s fees and costs. See First Development Inc. v. Bemaor, 449 So.2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finst Development, Inc. v. Bemaor
449 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
576 So. 2d 381, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 1991 WL 32134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-pontiac-saab-of-racine-inc-v-danburg-fladistctapp-1991.