Schadel v. Honig

134 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 203, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 291
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 18, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, KaLISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schadel v. Honig, 134 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 203, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 1926).

134 A. 919 (Schadel v. Honig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.