Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance

93 U.S. 241, 23 L. Ed. 862, 3 Otto 241, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1376
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 20, 1876
Docket122
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 93 U.S. 241 (Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 93 U.S. 241, 23 L. Ed. 862, 3 Otto 241, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1376 (1876).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

On opening this record, we find that the action below was assumpsit upon a policy of insurance for $1,400. There are two counts in the declaration, but they are both upon the same' cause of action; and although the damages, both in the writ and declaration, are laid at $3,000, it is apparent from the whole record that there could not be a recovery in •any event for -more than $1,400 and interest from July 14, 1873.

Our jurisdiction, when this writ issued, was limited in cases of this character to those in which the “matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum or value of $2,000.” Rev. Stat.,-sect. 692. Now, in the same class of cases, where *242 a judgment or decree has been rendered since May 1, 1875, the amount must be $5,000. 18 Stat. 316.

In Lee v. Watson, 1 Wall. 337, we held, that “in an action upon a money demand, whére the general issue is pleaded, the matter in dispute is the debt claimed, and its amount, as stated in the body of the declaration, and.not merely the damages alleged or the prayer ,for judgment at its conclusion must be considered in determining whether this court can take jurisdiction.” Applying this rule, which is clearly right, to the present case, it is ordered that the writ of error be

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George v. Lewis
204 F. Supp. 380 (D. Colorado, 1962)
Bishop v. Hamlet
365 P.2d 600 (Washington Supreme Court, 1961)
North American Iron & Steel Co. v. United States
130 F. Supp. 723 (E.D. New York, 1955)
Adams v. United States
101 F. Supp. 956 (D. Massachusetts, 1952)
Colorado Life Co. v. Steele
95 F.2d 535 (Eighth Circuit, 1938)
Loveland v. Riley
252 P. 154 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)
Ingham v. Harper & Son
128 P. 675 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)
Smithers v. Smith
204 U.S. 632 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Turner v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'n
101 F. 308 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)
Withers v. Hopkins Place Savings Bank
30 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cabot v. McMaster
61 F. 129 (N.D. Illinois, 1894)
Gorman v. Havird
141 U.S. 206 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Simon v. House
46 F. 317 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas, 1891)
Anchor Milling Co. v. Walsh
97 Mo. 287 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1888)
Kerr v. Simmons
82 Mo. 269 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Webster v. Buffalo Insurance
110 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Hilton v. Dickinson
108 U.S. 165 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Bachelder & Collins v. Richardson
1 Va. Dec. 474 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1882)
Gray v. Blanchard
97 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 U.S. 241, 23 L. Ed. 862, 3 Otto 241, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schacker-v-hartford-fire-insurance-scotus-1876.