Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Rosenberg

298 A.D.2d 451, 748 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 451 (Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Rosenberg, 298 A.D.2d 451, 748 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered July 31, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the complaint, granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof granting the cross motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered July 31, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the complaint, granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof granting the cross motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 451, 748 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schacker-real-estate-corp-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-2002.