Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Minassian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Minassian

270 A.D.2d 327, 704 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 327 (Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Minassian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schacker Real Estate Corp. v. Minassian, 270 A.D.2d 327, 704 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover a broker’s commission, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated January 12, 1999, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered February 17, 1999, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Brad Levine, Corey Goldstein, and Barry Greenfield, and the defendant Alex Castro, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

[328]*328Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, and the motions are denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Feuerstein, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover a broker’s commission, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated January 12, 1999, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered February 17, 1999, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Brad Levine, Corey Goldstein, and Barry Greenfield, and the defendant Alex Castro, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

[328]*328Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, and the motions are denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Thompson, J. P., Feuerstein, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 327, 704 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schacker-real-estate-corp-v-minassian-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack