Schack v. Louchheim Bros.

1 A. 429, 1 Sadler 111, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 662

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The questions in contention here were mainly those of fact. They were so correctly submitted to the jury that there were no exceptions to the general charge; and we see no error in the answers to the points submitted. Considerable latitude was allowed in the admission of evidence, yet, inasmuch as the question was one of fraud, we cannot say that the evidence is so remote as to call for a reversal.

J udgment affirmed.