Schack v. Louchheim Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Schack v. Louchheim Bros.

1 A. 429, 1 Sadler 111, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 662

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 19, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 A. 429 (Schack v. Louchheim Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schack v. Louchheim Bros., 1 A. 429, 1 Sadler 111, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 662 (Pa. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The questions in contention here were mainly those of fact. They were so correctly submitted to the jury that there were no exceptions to the general charge; and we see no error in the answers to the points submitted. Considerable latitude was allowed in the admission of evidence, yet, inasmuch as the question was one of fraud, we cannot say that the evidence is so remote as to call for a reversal.

J udgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The questions in contention here were mainly those of fact. They were so correctly submitted to the jury that there were no exceptions to the general charge; and we see no error in the answers to the points submitted. Considerable latitude was allowed in the admission of evidence, yet, inasmuch as the question was one of fraud, we cannot say that the evidence is so remote as to call for a reversal.

J udgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A. 429, 1 Sadler 111, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schack-v-louchheim-bros-pa-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack