Schachter v. News Syndicate Co.

270 A.D. 378, 59 N.Y.S.2d 693
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 378 (Schachter v. News Syndicate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schachter v. News Syndicate Co., 270 A.D. 378, 59 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Peck, J.

Defendants News Syndicate Co., Inc., and Neal Patterson appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings. Both the plaintiffs and said defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings and Special Term denied both motions.

The action is for libel. The complaint attaches the publication and the report of the referee and judgment of the court in a divorce proceeding, and alleges that the publication is a false and unfair report of the judicial proceedings. The answer sets forth defenses that the publication was truthful and a fair report of the judicial proceedings and fair comment thereon.. Where, as here and as conceded by the parties, all of the essential facts appear in the pleadings and the only question is a question of law as to whether the publication is a fair report of court documents attached to the complaint, judgment on the pleadings is proper.

We find the publication was substantially a fair account of the judicial proceedings. (George v. Time, Incorporated, 259 App. Div. 324, 328.) The legal consequence of the proceedings [381]*381was that the Florida divorce was not recognized and the marriage of the plaintiffs was invalid. The rephrasing of the legal text into lay language does not constitute a libel,, where the language of the publication fairly states the effect or significance of the court’s decision.

The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendants-appellants, and the motion of the defendants-appellants for judgment on the pleadings granted. • ■

Glennon, Dobe and Callahan, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Order so far as appealed from reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion of the defendants-appellants for judgment on the pleadings granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanft v. Heller
64 Misc. 2d 947 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Keogh v. New York Herald Tribune, Inc.
51 Misc. 2d 888 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
Edmiston v. Time, Incorporated
257 F. Supp. 22 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Phillips v. Murchison
252 F. Supp. 513 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.
276 A.D.2d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D. 378, 59 N.Y.S.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schachter-v-news-syndicate-co-nyappdiv-1946.