Schachter v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schachter v. City of New York

95 A.D.2d 731, 464 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.2d 731 (Schachter v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schachter v. City of New York, 95 A.D.2d 731, 464 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Irwin Silbowitz, J.), entered on February 19, 1982, which granted the cross motion for summary judgment by third-party defendant Julius Mock and Son, Inc., and denied the motion for summary judgment by defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., is reversed, on the law, with costs and disbursements to defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., and the motion for summary judgment by defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., granted. An examination of the stipulation with regard to the third-party action reveals that defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., stated that it would pursue its claim against third-party defendant Julius Mock and Son, Inc., but would be satisfied with whatever amounts were available under the policy of insurance written by Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, now in liquidation. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Irwin Silbowitz, J.), entered on February 19, 1982, which granted the cross motion for summary judgment by third-party defendant Julius Mock and Son, Inc., and denied the motion for summary judgment by defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., is reversed, on the law, with costs and disbursements to defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., and the motion for summary judgment by defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., granted. An examination of the stipulation with regard to the third-party action reveals that defendant and third-party plaintiff John T. Brady & Company, Inc., stated that it would pursue its claim against third-party defendant Julius Mock and Son, Inc., but would be satisfied with whatever amounts were available under the policy of insurance written by Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, now in liquidation. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 731, 464 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schachter-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1983.