Schacht Steel Construction, Inc. v. Brecher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schacht Steel Construction, Inc. v. Brecher

2 A.D.2d 967, 157 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3637

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 967 (Schacht Steel Construction, Inc. v. Brecher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schacht Steel Construction, Inc. v. Brecher, 2 A.D.2d 967, 157 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified to the extent of limiting the examination before trial of the partnership to a single partner to be selected by the partnership, and, of the corporation, to a single officer, agent or employee of the corporation to be selected by the corporation. The individuals whose examinations are sought, although sued as such indviduals and as partners, are all exactly in the same category. Some one of the partners has full knowledge of the facts and it is apparently unnecessary to examine the other five partnership defendants. A similar condition exists as far as the two corporate defendants are concerned. If it should prove necessary to examine any other persons, an appropriate application may be made. Settle order on notice. Concur—-Peek, P. J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Yalente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified to the extent of limiting the examination before trial of the partnership to a single partner to be selected by the partnership, and, of the corporation, to a single officer, agent or employee of the corporation to be selected by the corporation. The individuals whose examinations are sought, although sued as such indviduals and as partners, are all exactly in the same category. Some one of the partners has full knowledge of the facts and it is apparently unnecessary to examine the other five partnership defendants. A similar condition exists as far as the two corporate defendants are concerned. If it should prove necessary to examine any other persons, an appropriate application may be made. Settle order on notice. Concur—-Peek, P. J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Yalente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 967, 157 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schacht-steel-construction-inc-v-brecher-nyappdiv-1956.