Schacht Motor Truck Co. v. C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Schacht Motor Truck Co. v. C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co.

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 301

CourtOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati

DecidedJuly 1, 1924

DocketNo. 58868

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 301 (Schacht Motor Truck Co. v. C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schacht Motor Truck Co. v. C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 301 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

MARK, J.

The petition in this case alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of an automobile which was loaned for a consideration to one Van Horne, as bailee, and that while the truck was in the possession of the bailee it was damaged by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant, sa a part of its defense, set up in its answer the contributory negligence of the bailee and to this defense the plaintiff demurs on the ground that the facts were insufficient to constitute a defense at law. Held:

The negligence of the bailee is not imputable to the bailor, under such circumstances, for which reason the demlurrer to this defense in the answer is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARK, J.

The petition in this case alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of an automobile which was loaned for a consideration to one Van Horne, as bailee, and that while the truck was in the possession of the bailee it was damaged by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant, sa a part of its defense, set up in its answer the contributory negligence of the bailee and to this defense the plaintiff demurs on the ground that the facts were insufficient to constitute a defense at law. Held:

The negligence of the bailee is not imputable to the bailor, under such circumstances, for which reason the demlurrer to this defense in the answer is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schacht-motor-truck-co-v-c-c-c-st-l-ry-co-ohsuperctcinci-1924.