SCHAAR v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

SCHAAR v. State

347 S.W.3d 600, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 947, 2011 WL 2893065

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 12, 2011·No. ED 94876·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the judgment entered after a jury returned its verdict in favor of Roberta Schaar (hereinafter, “Employee”) on her claims of sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act. The jury awarded Employee compensatory and punitive damages. The State brings this eight-point appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the judgment entered after a jury returned its verdict in favor of Roberta Schaar (hereinafter, “Employee”) on her claims of sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act. The jury awarded Employee compensatory and punitive damages. The State brings this eight-point appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

SCHAAR v. State, 347 S.W.3d 600, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 947, 2011 WL 2893065 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

347 S.W.3d 600 (SCHAAR v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.