Schaal v. State

743 So. 2d 1229, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15148, 1999 WL 1036514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1999·No. No. 98-4377·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court erred as a matter of law in computing the appellant’s score under the sentencing guidelines. The trial court assessed a total of thirty-six points for a community sanction violation, six points for each of the six cases before the court for sentencing. Because the appellant’s probation violations were not successive, the points assigned for a community sanction violation should not have been applied cumulatively for each case. See Brown v. State, No. 98-3051, 741 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 720 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we vacate the appellant’s sentences and remand for sentencing with a corrected scoresheet reflecting a combined total of not more than six points as a community sanction violation.

Vacated and remanded.

ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR. BOOTH, J., DISSENTS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaal v. State, 743 So. 2d 1229, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15148, 1999 WL 1036514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

743 So. 2d 1229 (Schaal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
925 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Hannah v. State
814 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)