Schaake Packing Co. v. Croshaw
400 P.2d 608, 65 Wash. 2d 956, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 808
Opinion
The appellants by their cross complaint contend that the deed which they executed and delivered to the respondents was in fact a mortgage.
We have carefully considered the briefs, the oral arguments and the record. There is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s [957] finding that the transaction between the appellants and the respondents was a sale with an option to repurchase and not a mortgage.
This factual determination is decisive of the litigation.
The judgment is affirmed.
June 1, 1965. Petition for rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schaake Packing Co. v. Croshaw, 400 P.2d 608, 65 Wash. 2d 956, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 808 (Wash. 1965).
400 P.2d 608 (Schaake Packing Co. v. Croshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.