Schaaf v. Malaier
This text of Schaaf v. Malaier (Schaaf v. Malaier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 PHILLIP MICHAEL SCHAAF, CASE NO. 19-5312 RJB 11 Appellant, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 12 v. REOPEN CASE 13 MICHAEL G. MALAIER, Chapter 13 Trustee, and MARK D. WALDRON, 14 Chapter 7 Trustee, 15 Appellees. 16 17 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Appellant’s motion to reopen his case. 18 Dkt. 11. The Court has considered the motion and remaining file. 19 On April 17, 2019, this case was transferred from the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of 20 the Ninth Circuit. Dkt. 1. It is an appeal of an order from In re Schaaf, U.S. Bankruptcy Court 21 for the Western District of Washington case number 18-42254, Dkt. 76, entitled, “Order on 22 Trustee’s Objections to Exemptions.” Dkt. 1. On May 22, 2019, Mr. Schaaf filed a motion for 23 extension of time to “complete the record,” which was construed by the Court to be a motion for 24 1 extension of time for him to file a statement of issues and designate those portions of the record 2 which were relevant. The Appellees did not respond to the motion. 3 On June 4, 2019, Mr. Schaaf’s motion was granted and he was given until July 5, 2019 to 4 file a statement of issues and designate those portions of the record which were relevant. Dkt. 7. 5 On July 11, 2019, the U.S. Bankruptcy Clerk of the Court filed a Notice of Appeal Status/Notice
6 of Deficiency which indicated that the statement of issues and the designation of the record had 7 not been filed. Dkt. 8. Mr. Schaaf did not respond. 8 On July 15, 2019, Mr. Schaaf’s appeal was dismissed without prejudice under Fed. 9 Bankr. P. Rule 8009 (a)(1), for failure to file a statement of issues and designate the items to be 10 included in record for the appeal. Dkt. 9. 11 On July 29, 2019, Mr. Schaaf filed the instant motion, “requesting reinstatement of [his] 12 appeal.” Dkt. 11. He asserts that he has hired a lawyer. Id. 13 DISCUSSION AND DECISION 14 Under Fed. R Bankr. P. Rule 8009 (a)(1), an “appellant must file with the bankruptcy
15 clerk and serve on the appellee a designation of the items to be included in the record on appeal 16 and a statement of the issues to be presented.” District courts may impose sanctions, including 17 dismissal, upon any bankruptcy appellant who fails to take steps required to prosecute an appeal. 18 See Greco v. Stubenberg, 859 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir. 1988). “In determining whether to 19 dismiss an appeal on such grounds, a district court must consider (1) alternative measures in lieu 20 of dismissal, and (2) whether the conduct giving rise to the dismissal was caused entirely by the 21 party's attorney.” Id. 22 Mr. Schaaf’s motion to reopen his appeal should be denied. No attorney has entered a 23 notice of appearance for him in this appeal. Mr. Schaaf did not file a statement of issues or 24 1 designate those portions of the record which are relevant to his appeal. The reasoning from the 2 July 15, 2019 order dismissing the appeal still applies and is adopted here. This case should 3 remain closed. 4 IT IS ORDERED: 5 • The Appellant’s motion to reopen his case (Dkt. 11) IS DENIED.
6 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 7 to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 8 Dated this 20th day of August, 2019. A 9
10 ROBERT J. BRYAN United States District Judge 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schaaf v. Malaier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaaf-v-malaier-wawd-2019.