Schaad v. Russell Gardens, Inc.

177 N.E. 134, 256 N.Y. 546, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1119
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 177 N.E. 134 (Schaad v. Russell Gardens, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaad v. Russell Gardens, Inc., 177 N.E. 134, 256 N.Y. 546, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1119 (N.Y. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the appeal by the defendant from the order of the Special Term which denied the defendant’s motion for judgment upon the pleadings, it was error for the Appellate Division to decide as a matter of law that the covenant of the grantor contained in the deed from Frederick Russell to Herman B. Schaad is limited to a part of the next to the last sentence therein.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be *549 reversed and the order of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 N.E. 134, 256 N.Y. 546, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaad-v-russell-gardens-inc-ny-1931.