Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V.

605 So. 2d 1027, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11066, 1992 WL 296040

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 1992

DocketNo. 92-355

StatusPublished

This text of 605 So. 2d 1027 (Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schaad v. Frisk Corp., N.V., 605 So. 2d 1027, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11066, 1992 WL 296040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was competent substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and reinstate the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See Stirling v. Sapp, 229 So.2d 850 (Fla.1969); United Farm Agency of Fla., Inc. v. DKLS, Inc., 560 So.2d 1212 (Fla.3d DCA 1990).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There was competent substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and reinstate the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See Stirling v. Sapp, 229 So.2d 850 (Fla.1969); United Farm Agency of Fla., Inc. v. DKLS, Inc., 560 So.2d 1212 (Fla.3d DCA 1990).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 So. 2d 1027, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11066, 1992 WL 296040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaad-v-frisk-corp-nv-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack