Schaad v. Edebohls

Superior Court of New York

Schaad v. Edebohls

29 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJuly 2, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.Y.S. 1149 (Schaad v. Edebohls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schaad v. Edebohls, 29 N.Y.S. 1149 (superctny 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaad-v-edebohls-superctny-1894.