Schaad v. Edebohls

Superior Court of New York

Schaad v. Edebohls

29 N.Y.S. 1149

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided July 2, 1894·Published

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Schaad v. Edebohls, 29 N.Y.S. 1149 (superctny 1894).

Pincite

29 N.Y.S. 1149 (Schaad v. Edebohls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.