Schaad v. Edebohls

The Superior Court of New York City

Schaad v. Edebohls

9 Misc. 708, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, 29 N.Y.S. 1149, 1894 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 817

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Misc. 708 (Schaad v. Edebohls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schaad v. Edebohls, 9 Misc. 708, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, 29 N.Y.S. 1149, 1894 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 817 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

McAdam, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J.

The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

McAdam, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Misc. 708, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, 29 N.Y.S. 1149, 1894 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaad-v-edebohls-nysuperctnyc-1894.