Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company

163 A. 663, 110 N.J.L. 16, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 406
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 5, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 163 A. 663 (Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company, 163 A. 663, 110 N.J.L. 16, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 406 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 226.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A. 663, 110 N.J.L. 16, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaack-v-ja-holmes-construction-company-nj-1933.