Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company
163 A. 663, 110 N.J.L. 16, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 406
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 226.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company, 163 A. 663, 110 N.J.L. 16, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 406 (N.J. 1933).
163 A. 663 (Schaack v. J.A. Holmes Construction Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.