S.C.H. Realty, Inc. v. South Bayshore Development Corp.

460 So. 2d 1031, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 111, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11835
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 2, 1985·No. No. 84-1153·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment against appellant, S.C.H. Realty, Inc. [S.C.H.] upon a finding that seller-principal, South Bayshore Development Corporation [South Bayshore], is not liable to subagent-broker S.C.H. in light of the undisputed evidence in the record indicating that South Bayshore neither directly contracted with S.C.H. to retain its services nor authorized or ratified the employment of S.C.H. Whidden v. Morse, 213 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.C.H. Realty, Inc. v. South Bayshore Development Corp., 460 So. 2d 1031, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 111, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

460 So. 2d 1031 (S.C.H. Realty, Inc. v. South Bayshore Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whidden v. Morse
213 So. 2d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)