Scelzi v. Kruchel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scelzi v. Kruchel

3 A.D.2d 917, 163 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 917 (Scelzi v. Kruchel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scelzi v. Kruchel, 3 A.D.2d 917, 163 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

As the result of a collision between two motor vehicles, an action was instituted by (a) Frank N. Scelzi, owner and operator of one of the vehicles, to recover damages for injuries to his person and property, (b) Antoinette L. Scelzi, his mother, a passenger therein, to recover damages for personal injuries, and (e) Frank Scelzi, her husband, for medical expenses and loss of services. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendants with respect to the owner and passenger, and in favor of the husband. The trial [918]*918court set aside the verdict and granted a new trial with respect to the passenger and her husband on the ground that it was inconsistent. The owner, the passenger, and her husband appeal from an order dated June 22, 1955 denying their motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that they did not have a fair trial by an impartial jury. These appeals have been abandoned. The owner appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict after severance of the action with respect to the passenger and her husband. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, TJghetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As the result of a collision between two motor vehicles, an action was instituted by (a) Frank N. Scelzi, owner and operator of one of the vehicles, to recover damages for injuries to his person and property, (b) Antoinette L. Scelzi, his mother, a passenger therein, to recover damages for personal injuries, and (e) Frank Scelzi, her husband, for medical expenses and loss of services. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendants with respect to the owner and passenger, and in favor of the husband. The trial [918]*918court set aside the verdict and granted a new trial with respect to the passenger and her husband on the ground that it was inconsistent. The owner, the passenger, and her husband appeal from an order dated June 22, 1955 denying their motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that they did not have a fair trial by an impartial jury. These appeals have been abandoned. The owner appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict after severance of the action with respect to the passenger and her husband. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, TJghetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 917, 163 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scelzi-v-kruchel-nyappdiv-1957.