SCDSS v. Tedric Valentine

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJune 26, 2025
Docket2024-000893
StatusUnpublished

This text of SCDSS v. Tedric Valentine (SCDSS v. Tedric Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SCDSS v. Tedric Valentine, (S.C. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Catherine Maness, Tedric Valentine, and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Tedric Valentine is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2024-000893

Appeal From Greenville County Thomas T. Hodges, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-211 Submitted June 6, 2025 – Filed June 26, 2025

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant. Amanda Stiles, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Don J. Stevenson, of Don J. Stevenson, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Tedric Valentine appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2024). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Cauthen
354 S.E.2d 381 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SCDSS v. Tedric Valentine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scdss-v-tedric-valentine-scctapp-2025.