SCDSS v. Roberts

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 13, 2016
Docket2016-UP-426
StatusUnpublished

This text of SCDSS v. Roberts (SCDSS v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SCDSS v. Roberts, (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Jessica J. Roberts, Richard W. Valentine, Jr., Jessie Lee Crosby, Henry Crosby, Donna Crosby, Chris Lovelace, and Sherri Lovelace, Defendants,

Of whom Jessica J. Roberts is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2015-002064

Appeal From Colleton County Deborah A. Malphrus, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-426 Submitted September 13, 2016 – Filed October 13, 2016

AFFIRMED

Marshall L. Horton and Lindsay Yoas Goodman, both of Horton & Goodman, LLC, of Bluffton, for Appellant.

Jillian D. Ullman, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Walterboro, for Respondent. Gregory Michael Galvin, of the Galvin Law Group, of Bluffton, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Barber v. Barber, 402 S.C. 96, 97 n.1, 738 S.E.2d 845, 845 n.1 (Ct. App. 2013) (addressing only one of the five issues the husband raised on appeal because he conceded the remaining four issues); Way v. Way, 398 S.C. 1, 7 n.7, 726 S.E.2d 215, 219 n.7 (Ct. App. 2012) (finding this court need not address an issue that was conceded on appeal).

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Way v. Way
726 S.E.2d 215 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2012)
Barber v. Barber
738 S.E.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SCDSS v. Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scdss-v-roberts-scctapp-2016.