SCDSS v. James
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Jennifer Christine Young and Joshua Brent James, Defendants,
Of whom Joshua Brent James is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2018-001570
Appeal From Greenville County Thomas T. Hodges, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-120 Submitted March 15, 2019 – Filed March 25, 2019
AFFIRMED
John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent. Don J. Stevenson, of Don J. Stevenson, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Joshua Brent James appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve James's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SCDSS v. James (SCDSS v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.