SCDSS v. Buckner

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 23, 2006
Docket2006-MO-034
StatusUnpublished

This text of SCDSS v. Buckner (SCDSS v. Buckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SCDSS v. Buckner, (S.C. 2006).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS 
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Travis S. Buckner, Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
 Rolly W. Jacobs, Family Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No.  2006-MO-034
Heard September 19, 2006 – Filed October 23, 2006


DISMISSED


Jeremy C. Whitley, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, of Columbia, for Appellant.

P. Lawrence Hoffman, of Columbia, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM:  This is an appeal from an order of the family court increasing Appellant’s child support obligation.  We dismiss the appeal as moot.  Seabrook v. Knox, 369 S.C. 191, 631 S.E.2d 901 (2006) (case is moot where judgment rendered by the court will have no practical legal effect upon an existing controversy because an intervening event renders any grant of effectual relief impossible for the reviewing court).

APPEAL DISMISSED

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seabrook v. Knox
631 S.E.2d 907 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SCDSS v. Buckner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scdss-v-buckner-sc-2006.