SCDSS v. Buckner
This text of SCDSS v. Buckner (SCDSS v. Buckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Travis S. Buckner, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
Rolly W. Jacobs, Family Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2006-MO-034
Heard September 19, 2006 Filed October 23, 2006
DISMISSED
Jeremy C. Whitley, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, of Columbia, for Appellant.
P. Lawrence Hoffman, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from an order of the family court increasing Appellants child support obligation. We dismiss the appeal as moot. Seabrook v. Knox, 369 S.C. 191, 631 S.E.2d 901 (2006) (case is moot where judgment rendered by the court will have no practical legal effect upon an existing controversy because an intervening event renders any grant of effectual relief impossible for the reviewing court).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SCDSS v. Buckner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scdss-v-buckner-sc-2006.