SCDSS v. Bethel
This text of SCDSS v. Bethel (SCDSS v. Bethel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Kristina Bethel, Robert Bethel, Joseph Bricen, and John Doe, Defendants,
Of whom Kristina Bethel is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000482
Appeal from Marlboro County Timothy H. Pogue, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-004 Submitted December 21, 2016 – Filed January 4, 2017
AFFIRMED
Sally Ward Peace, of Sally Ward Peace, PA, of Conway, for Appellant.
Delton W. Powers, Jr., of Powers Law Firm, PC, of Bennettsville, for Respondent. Elizabeth Rogers Munnerlyn, of Elizabeth R. Munnerlyn, PA, of Bennettsville, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Kristina Bethel appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 383 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Kristina Bethel's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SCDSS v. Bethel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scdss-v-bethel-scctapp-2017.