Scattergood v. Scattergood

409 So. 2d 219, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19099
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1982·No. No. 81-733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/former-wife failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by declining to award alimony after an extremely brief marriage. Thus, we affirm that portion of the final judgment. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). However, we reverse paragraph two of the final judgment which requires the former-wife to sell to the former-husband two items of jewelry which the court found to be gifts from the former-husband. Once it was established that the two items were gifts, the former-wife was entitled to exclusive and uninterrupted possession. See Sihler v. Sihler, 376 So.2d 941 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scattergood v. Scattergood, 409 So. 2d 219, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

409 So. 2d 219 (Scattergood v. Scattergood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Sihler v. Sihler
376 So. 2d 941 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)