Scattergood v. Ingram

Ohio Supreme Court

Scattergood v. Ingram

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 460

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1914

DocketNo. 13731

StatusPublished

This text of 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 460 (Scattergood v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scattergood v. Ingram, 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 460 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court reversed on grounds stated in journal entry.

The court finds that the said circuit court erred in its third conclusion of law as included in its final entry in said case, and this court finds that the said plaintiff in error is entitled to interest on the said notes referred to calculated with annual rests. And this court finds that in all other respects the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the circuit court are correct.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, reversed and this cause is remanded to the court of appeals of Columbiana county with instructions to make an accounting between the parties in accordance with the finding of this court above made.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the circuit court reversed on grounds stated in journal entry.

The court finds that the said circuit court erred in its third conclusion of law as included in its final entry in said case, and this court finds that the said plaintiff in error is entitled to interest on the said notes referred to calculated with annual rests. And this court finds that in all other respects the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the circuit court are correct.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, reversed and this cause is remanded to the court of appeals of Columbiana county with instructions to make an accounting between the parties in accordance with the finding of this court above made.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scattergood-v-ingram-ohio-1914.