Scates v. West
This text of Scates v. West (Scates v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This version contains the errata of February 8, 2000 - e
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS
NO . 97-875
MITCHELL SCATES, JR., APPELLANT ,
V.
TOGO D. WEST , JR., SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.
KENNETH B. MASON , JR., INTERVENOR.
Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY, HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.
ORDER
After the Court issued its opinion in Scates v. West, 13 Vet.App. 98 (1999), the intervenor filed a motion for reconsideration and an alternative motion for a full Court decision. Because a majority of the panel voted to deny reconsideration, the alternative motion for a full Court decision was circulated to the full Court. Thereafter, on December 15, 1999, amicus curiae for the appellant was requested to file a reply to the intervenor's motion, and on January 14, 2000, counsel for the appellant filed such a reply. On January 24, 2000, the intervenor responded.
A majority of the Court has voted to grant the intervenor's motion. The Clerk is directed to schedule this case for oral argument as soon as the business of the Court permits.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the intervenor's motion for a full Court decision is granted. It is further
ORDERED that the Court's decision in Scates, supra, is withdrawn.
DATED: February 2, 2000 PER CURIAM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scates v. West, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scates-v-west-cavc-2000.