Scates v. State of Florida
This text of Scates v. State of Florida (Scates v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2038 _____________________________
BROGDEN DANIELLE SCATES,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
January 6, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED.
LEWIS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Brogden Danielle Scates, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scates v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scates-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.