Scarpetta v. Lee
This text of Scarpetta v. Lee (Scarpetta v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 21-JUN-2023 08:24 AM Dkt. 19 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
ALEJANDRO SCARPETTA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEANNA LEE, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT SOUTH KOHALA DIVISION (CASE NO. 3DV15100237K)
ORDER FOR SANCTIONS AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.) Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellee Alejandro
Scarpetta's (Scarpetta) April 18, 2023 Motion to Dismiss Appeal,
the papers in support, the record, and there being no opposition,
it appears that:
(1) On March 10, 2023, the court ordered Defendant-
Appellant Deanna Lee (Lee) to file, within five days, a civil
appeal docketing statement (CADS), or a motion for an extension
of time demonstrating good cause why she is unable to do so, and
issued an order to show cause (OSC) to her counsel, Jamae K.K.
Kawauchi (Kawauchi), to show cause, within ten days, why a CADS
has not been filed;
(2) Lee did not file the CADS, or request an extension
of time, even though the court cautioned Lee that failure to file
the CADS may result in sanctions, including dismissal of the NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
appeal under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
3.1(f), and Kawauchi did not file a response to the OSC, even
though the court cautioned Kawauchi that failure to timely
respond or to show good cause may result in sanctions;
(3) Lee's statement of jurisdiction and opening brief
were due on or before February 16, 2023, and March 20, 2023,
respectively;
(4) Lee did not file either document or request an
extension;
(5) On March 22, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a
default notice informing Lee that the time for filing the
statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the
matter would be called to the court's attention on April 3, 2023,
for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the
appeal under HRAP Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Lee could request
relief from default by motion;
(6) Lee took no further action in the appeal; and
(7) On April 18, 2023, Scarpetta filed a Motion to
Dismiss Appeal for failure to file the CADS, statement of
jurisdiction, and opening brief, which Lee has not opposed.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Under HRAP Rule 51, Jamae K. K. Kawauchi is
sanctioned in the amount of $50.00.
2. A check in the full amount, payable to the State
Director of Finance, along with a copy of this order, shall be
deposited with the Supreme Court Clerk's office within ten (10)
days from the date of this order.
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
3. A declaration by counsel attesting to the payment
shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
4. The sanction shall be paid by counsel personally and
without reimbursement.
5. Failure to comply with this order may result in
additional sanctions, including referral to the Office of
Disciplinary Counsel.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Appeal
is granted. The appeal is dismissed under HRAP Rules 3.1(f),
12.1(e), and 30, for failure to file a civil appeal docketing
statement, statement of jurisdiction and opening brief.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 21, 2023.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scarpetta v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarpetta-v-lee-hawapp-2023.