Scarlett v. Scarlett

382 A.2d 760, 252 Pa. Super. 641
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 7, 1978
DocketAppeal, No. 723
StatusPublished

This text of 382 A.2d 760 (Scarlett v. Scarlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scarlett v. Scarlett, 382 A.2d 760, 252 Pa. Super. 641 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court is vacated, and the case is remanded for a full opinion stating the lower court’s reasons for its visitation order. Gunter v. Gunter, 240 Pa.Superior Ct. 382, 361 A.2d 307 (1976); Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. Shuster, 226 Pa.Superior Ct. 229, 312 A.2d 58 (1973).

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunter v. Gunter
361 A.2d 307 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. Shuster
312 A.2d 58 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 A.2d 760, 252 Pa. Super. 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarlett-v-scarlett-pasuperct-1978.