Scarf v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

233 F.2d 176
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 2, 1956·No. No. 337, Docket 23927·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals because of the dismissal, for improper venue, of his action for personal injuries sustained by him at the Gander airport in Newfoundland, Canada, when he fell because of a space created between the. TWA plane he was boarding and the boarding ramp. But the action was not terminated as to another defendant accused of negligence in the installation and maintenance of the ramp, and the order appealed from contains no finding of absence of just reason for delay or direction for final judgment as is authorized by Fed.RulesCiv.Proc. rule 54(b), 28 U.S.C.A. Consequently the order is not presently appealable. United Artists Corp. v. Masterpiece Productions, 2 Cir., 221 F.2d 213; Rao v. Port of New York Authority, 2 Cir., 222 F.2d 362.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scarf v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 233 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1956).

233 F.2d 176 (Scarf v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linkous Ex Rel. Linkous v. Darch
299 S.W.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1957)