Scarf v. Fanton
133 A. 924, 4 N.J. Misc. 636, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 147
This text of 133 A. 924 (Scarf v. Fanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scarf v. Fanton, 133 A. 924, 4 N.J. Misc. 636, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 147 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The .plaintiff’s action is for rent. The defendant sets up a counter-claim for unliquidated damages. The ease is controlled by Kelly v. Faitoute Iron and Steel Co., 87 N. J. L. 567; Jenkins v. Schneidman, 4 N. J. Adv. R. 1005. The plaintiff’s motion to strike out the counter-claim is allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 A. 924, 4 N.J. Misc. 636, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarf-v-fanton-nj-1926.