Scarborough v. Zimmon
This text of 437 N.E.2d 1157 (Scarborough v. Zimmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]) (see, e.g., Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 N.E.2d 1157, 56 N.Y.2d 784, 452 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-zimmon-ny-1982.