Scarborough v. Zimmon

437 N.E.2d 1157, 56 N.Y.2d 784, 452 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3435
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 20, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 437 N.E.2d 1157 (Scarborough v. Zimmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scarborough v. Zimmon, 437 N.E.2d 1157, 56 N.Y.2d 784, 452 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3435 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]) (see, e.g., Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scarborough v. Zimmon
453 N.E.2d 530 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Corrado v. Bendell
93 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Tonello v. Carborundum Co.
91 A.D.2d 1169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Migliaccio v. Phoenix Insurance
91 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Scarborough v. Zimmon
90 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 N.E.2d 1157, 56 N.Y.2d 784, 452 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-zimmon-ny-1982.