Scarborough v. State

708 So. 2d 701, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 1998 WL 227652
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 8, 1998
DocketNo. 98-494
StatusPublished

This text of 708 So. 2d 701 (Scarborough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scarborough v. State, 708 So. 2d 701, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 1998 WL 227652 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As in White v. State, 656 So.2d 255, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), “we reverse the denial of the [defendant’s 3.800-3.850] motion and remand the case ... to allow the trial court to determine whether, as part of a negotiated plea, the appellant specifically waived the right to receive credit for time served.” See generally Vanderblomen v. State, 709 So.2d [702]*702144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Because, if his position is correct, Scarborough may be entitled to immediate release — and, in any case, may be entitled to withdraw his plea — we direct that the matter be heard expeditiously below and dispense with rehearing here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanderblomen v. State
709 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
White v. State
656 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 So. 2d 701, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 1998 WL 227652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.