Scarborough v. State

654 So. 2d 300, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4851, 1995 WL 259147
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1912
StatusPublished

This text of 654 So. 2d 300 (Scarborough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scarborough v. State, 654 So. 2d 300, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4851, 1995 WL 259147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, we determine that the trial court properly denied the 1994 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellee, however, properly concedes that appellant is entitled to a new hearing on his 1974 motion for post-conviction relief, because appellant was not present at the original hearing, nor was he advised of his right to take an appeal. Clark v. State, 491 So.2d 545 (Fla.1986); Shevin v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
491 So. 2d 545 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State Ex Rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal
316 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 So. 2d 300, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4851, 1995 WL 259147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.