Scarborough v. Harris

1 S.C.L. 177
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
DecidedMay 15, 1791
StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C.L. 177 (Scarborough v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scarborough v. Harris, 1 S.C.L. 177 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1791).

Opinion

Per tot. Curiam.

1. Although it may not be necessary, in some cases, to give drawer notice of protest, as where drawer had no effects in drawee’s hands, Doug. SS. yet this rule will in no case apply to an indorser. 5 Burr. 2607. For in all cases whatever, the holder of a bill must give reasonable notice to the indorser, that is, by first post or convenient opportunity, which is partly a matter of fact for jury, what is reasonable or not. , Doug. 499.

2. Wherever a new credit is given, the party holding, takes it upon himself; and in no case where the holder gives time for payment to the maker, is the indorser liable. 1 Term Rep. 167. 714. 1 Well. 48,

Verdict for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.C.L. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-harris-pactcompl-1791.