Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Scarborough v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Scarborough v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

92 A.D.3d 752, 938 N.Y.2d 804
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.3d 752 (Scarborough v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scarborough v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 92 A.D.3d 752, 938 N.Y.2d 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the jury verdict on the issue of damages finding that she sustained no damages for future pain and suffering and future medical expenses was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and, thus, was not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744 [1995]; Querin v Scotti, 89 AD3d 713 [2011]; [753]*753DeVito v Oi Ying Ho, 25 AD3d 750, 752 [2006]; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134 [1985]). Mastro, A.PJ., Angiolillo, Eng and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.
655 N.E.2d 163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
DeVito v. Oi Ying Ho
25 A.D.3d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Querin v. Scotti
89 A.D.3d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 752, 938 N.Y.2d 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-federated-department-stores-inc-nyappdiv-2012.