Scarborough v. Bartholomew
263 A.D. 765, 30 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 263 A.D. 765 (Scarborough v. Bartholomew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scarborough v. Bartholomew, 263 A.D. 765, 30 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
Opinion
The issue here involved is the same as in Purdy v. McGarity, decided herewith (262 App. Div. 623). Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements upon the authority of Purdy v. McGarity (supra). Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tober v. Hampton
136 N.W.2d 194 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Condor Investment Co. v. Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
211 F. Supp. 671 (D. Oregon, 1962)
Furrer v. Yew Creek Logging Co.
292 P.2d 499 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
Bolton v. Ziegler
111 F. Supp. 516 (N.D. Iowa, 1953)
Capo v. C-O Two Fire Equipment Co.
93 F. Supp. 4 (D. New Jersey, 1950)
American Alliance Insurance Co v. Capital National Bank of Sacramento
171 P.2d 449 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 765, 30 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-bartholomew-nyappdiv-1941.