Scarborough v. Bartholomew
263 A.D. 765, 30 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1941·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The issue here involved is the same as in Purdy v. McGarity, decided herewith (262 App. Div. 623). Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements upon the authority of Purdy v. McGarity (supra). Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scarborough v. Bartholomew, 263 A.D. 765, 30 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
263 A.D. 765 (Scarborough v. Bartholomew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tober v. Hampton
136 N.W.2d 194 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)
Condor Investment Co. v. Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
211 F. Supp. 671 (D. Oregon, 1962)
Furrer v. Yew Creek Logging Co.
292 P.2d 499 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
Bolton v. Ziegler
111 F. Supp. 516 (N.D. Iowa, 1953)
Capo v. C-O Two Fire Equipment Co.
93 F. Supp. 4 (D. New Jersey, 1950)
American Alliance Insurance Co v. Capital National Bank of Sacramento
171 P.2d 449 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)