Scarane v. T. H. Fraser Mortgage Corp.
This text of 279 A.D. 602 (Scarane v. T. H. Fraser Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is our opinion that the contract should have been received in evidence and other excluded proof permitted to determine whether the subscription of the seller’s name in typewriting was authorized by the seller and made with the intention of subscribing the seller’s name within the intent and meaning of section 259 of the Real Property Law. (Bork v. Martin, 132 N. Y. 280. 285; Landeker v. Co-Operative Bldg. Bank, 71 Misc. 517, 518; Mesibov, Glinert & Levy v. Cohen Bros. Mfg. Co., 245 N. Y. 305, 310; Koch v. Regan, 272 App. Div. 920.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 602, 107 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarane-v-t-h-fraser-mortgage-corp-nyappdiv-1951.