Scantlen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Scantlen v. State

236 S.W.2d 131, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2254

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 31, 1951

DocketNo. 25127

StatusPublished

This text of 236 S.W.2d 131 (Scantlen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scantlen v. State, 236 S.W.2d 131, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2254 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft. The penalty is assessed at confinement in the county jail for 365 days.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft. The penalty is assessed at confinement in the county jail for 365 days.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 S.W.2d 131, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scantlen-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.